How is Virtru Email Data Protection Different from Proofpoint?
Get an objective comparison of Virtru vs. Proofpoint, based on functionality, user experience, features, and deployment.
Many customers of modern email providers, such as Google and Microsoft, require additional encryption and data protection capabilities to meet regulatory, compliance, or privacy needs. Virtru strikes a stronger balance between security and ease of use while Proofpoint’s limited protections, controls, and visibility may leave you susceptible to data loss.
- Virtru offers absolute security and control with client-side, end-to-end encryption, granular controls, persistent visibility, and customer-hosted keys.
- Virtru end-users have a more consistent and seamless UX. Senders can manually enable encryption on-demand, increasing adoption.
- Virtru offers an easier administrative experience with more controls to strengthen security posture. The Virtru Control Center gives visibility over who has accessed data (and when), all through a seamless, unified web portal.
- Virtru makes sender protections and recipient access seamless and secure.
Download this head-to-head product analysis that was completed by an experienced deployment engineer who has implemented both Virtru and Proofpoint at multiple large enterprises.