<img src="https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/activity/src=11631230;type=pagevw0;cat=pw_allpg;dc_lat=;dc_rdid=;tag_for_child_directed_treatment=;tfua=;npa=;gdpr=${GDPR};gdpr_consent=${GDPR_CONSENT_755};ord=1;num=1?" width="1" height="1" alt="">
Guide

Virtru vs. Zix: Evaluating Email Encryption Products

Get an objective comparison of Virtru and Zix, based on functionality, user experience, features, and deployment.

virtru-vs-zix

Many customers of modern email providers, such as Google and Microsoft, require additional encryption and data protection capabilities to meet regulatory, compliance, or privacy needs.

Eliminate risks and develop a security strategy for complete email protection, reinforce native Gmail and Microsoft encryption with a third-party data-centric solution that ensures unauthorized users, your email provider or even your third-party encryption provider—are not able to access your content.

Download this guide for a competitive comparison of Virtru vs Zix for email encryption and data protection.

What You’ll Learn:

  • Virtru offers absolute security and control with client-side, end-to-end encryption, granular controls, persistent visibility, and customer-hosted keys.
  • Virtru end-users have a more consistent and seamless UX. Senders can manually enable encryption on-demand, increasing adoption.
  • Virtru offers an easier administrative experience with more controls to strengthen security posture. The Virtru Control Center gives visibility over who has accessed data (and when), all through a seamless, unified web portal.
  • Virtru makes sender protections and recipient access seamless and secure.