<img src="https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/activity/src=11631230;type=pagevw0;cat=pw_allpg;dc_lat=;dc_rdid=;tag_for_child_directed_treatment=;tfua=;npa=;gdpr=${GDPR};gdpr_consent=${GDPR_CONSENT_755};ord=1;num=1?" width="1" height="1" alt="">

Virtru vs. Zix: Evaluating Email Encryption Products

Get an objective comparison of Virtru and Zix, based on functionality, user experience, features, and deployment.

Many customers of modern email providers, such as Google and Microsoft, require additional encryption and data protection capabilities to meet regulatory, compliance, or privacy needs.

Eliminate risks and develop a security strategy for complete email protection, reinforce native Gmail and Microsoft encryption with a third-party data-centric solution that ensures unauthorized users, your email provider or even your third-party encryption provider—are not able to access your content.

Download this guide for a competitive comparison of Virtru vs Zix for email encryption and data protection.


What You’ll Learn:

  • Virtru offers absolute security and control with client-side, end-to-end encryption, granular controls, persistent visibility, and customer-hosted keys.
  • Virtru end-users have a more consistent and seamless UX. Senders can manually enable encryption on-demand, increasing adoption.
  • Virtru offers an easier administrative experience with more controls to strengthen security posture. The Virtru Control Center gives visibility over who has accessed data (and when), all through a seamless, unified web portal.
  • Virtru makes sender protections and recipient access seamless and secure.